Ponatinib (Iclusig) – GREAT NEWS!!!

Leave a comment

I love news like this, especially when it’s been four-years in the making.

Iclusig (ponatinib) for the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) in adult patients with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML who are resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation.

For CML patient in England, this means we now have another safety net that is readily available for consultants to prescribe immediately. This is going to make a big difference to treatment options and the mental well-being of many patients.

Just a quick shout to all of the people who work for and are associated with Incyte (formally ARIAD) who’ve never given up on this and have worked so hard to get it to us. Congratulations and thank you.

NICE has also recommended ponatinib for treating Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adults. Hit the link for more info on this: www.leukaemiacare.org.uk/news/NICE-recommends-ponatinib

The full press release follows.

Kris

 

NICE Issues Positive Final Recommendation for Iclusig (ponatinib) for Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) in England

CML patients across the UK who are resistant or intolerant to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies will now have equal access to Iclusig

LONDON, UK [28 April 2017] – Incyte Corporation (Nasdaq:INCY) announces that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisal Committee (TAC) has published a positive Final Appraisal Determination (FAD) recommending Iclusigâ (ponatinib) for the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) in adult patients with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML who are resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation.[i]

The positive FAD from NICE brings CML patients in England in line with those in Wales and Scotland who have had full-access to Iclusig, according to its license,[ii],[iii] since 2015; providing patients with CML across the UK who have failed other treatments equal access to an additional and important option.

Today’s decision is important for patients with CML who have failed other treatments, as well as for physicians in England, who will now have access to the clinical benefits of Iclusig,” commented Mark Tanner, General Manager of Incyte Bioscience UK. “Together with the CML community, we have worked very hard over the last four years to encourage NICE to reconsider their original evaluation and are delighted that NICE has acknowledged the unmet need and the value that Iclusig brings.”

CML is a rare blood cancer with around 700 new cases each year in the UK.[iv]  CML affects economically active people, with around 50 percent of UK cases in people aged under 65 years.iv Many patients with a new diagnosis of CML have a prolonged clinical benefit from targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, there has been a high unmet need and poor prognosis for patients whose advanced disease is resistant and intolerant to other therapies.[v] Once available treatment options are exhausted, the prognosis can be poor.v  Despite advances in treatment, there remains a need for additional effective therapies for the management of CML.[vi] Iclusig fulfils an important need in the treatment pathway for CML patients and provides clinicians and patients with a full suite of treatment options for CML.

Professor Jane Apperley, Department of Haematology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London said, “This is an exciting and long-awaited outcome, which allows physicians to manage patients in a logical and clinical-evidence based manner with the goals of improving long-term survival and providing a good quality of life.”

Iclusig was approved by the European Commission[vii] in 2013 as an orphan drug for the treatment of adults with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML who are resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate. In Ph+ALL (Philadelphia chromosome‒positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia) patients, Iclusig is licensed for adult patients with Ph+ ALL who are resistant to dasatinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate. Iclusig is also licensed for people with CML and PH+ALL who have T315I mutation.[viii]

About CML and Ph+ ALL

CML is a cancer of the white blood cells that is diagnosed in approximately 7,000 patients each year in Europe.[ix] CML is characterized by an excessive and unregulated production of white blood cells by the bone marrow due to a genetic abnormality that produces the BCR-ABL protein. After a chronic phase of production of too many white blood cells, CML typically evolves to the more aggressive phases referred to as accelerated phase and blast crisis. Ph+ ALL is a subtype of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia that carries the Ph+ chromosome that produces BCR-ABL. It has a more aggressive course than CML and is often treated with a combination of chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The BCR-ABL protein is expressed in both of these diseases.

About Iclusig® (ponatinib) tablets

Iclusig targets not only native BCR-ABL but also its isoforms that carry mutations that confer resistance to treatment, including the T315I mutation, which has been associated with resistance to other approved TKIs.

In the EU, Iclusig is approved for the treatment of adult patients with chronic phase, accelerated phase or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who are resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation, or the treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) who are resistant to dasatinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation.

Incyte has an exclusive license from ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, to develop and commercialize Iclusig in the European Union and 28 other countries, including Switzerland, Norway, Turkey, Israel and Russia.

About Incyte

Incyte Corporation is a U.S.-based biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of proprietary therapeutics. For additional information on Incyte, please visit the Company’s website at www.incyte.com.

Follow @Incyte on Twitter at https://twitter.com/Incyte.

[i] NICE. 2017. Final Appraisal Determination: Ponatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ta10060/documents/final-appraisal-determination-document Last accessed 28 April 2017

[ii] All Wales Medicines Strategy Group. Ponatinib (Iclusig). Appraisals. Available at: http://www.awmsg.org/awmsgonline/app/appraisalinfo/1163. Last accessed 24 March 2017

[iii] Scottish Medicines Consortium. SMC Advice. Ponatinib (Iclusig). Available at: http://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/SMC_Advice/Advice/1032_15_ponatinib_Iclusig/ponatinib_Iclusig. Last accessed April 2017.

[iv] CRUK. Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) incidence statistics. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/leukaemia-cml/incidence/. Last accessed April 2017.

[v] Cortes JE, KimD-W, Pinilla-Ibarz J, et al. A Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Leukemias. N Engl J Med 2013;369: 1783-1796. Available at: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1306494.

[vi] Woessner DW, Lim CS, Deininger MW. Development of an Effective Therapy for CML. Cancer J 2011;17(6):doi:10.1097/PPO.0b013e318237e5b7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3251313/pdf/nihms-332259.pdf. Last accessed April 2017.

[vii] EMA. Iclusig EPAR summary for the public.  Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/002695/human_med_001656.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124. Last accessed April 2017.

[viii] Iclusig Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/28145. Last accessed April 2017.

[ix] Rohrbacher M, Hasford J. Epidemiology of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2009 Sep;22(3):295-302. Based on current estimate of population of Europe (738,199,000 in 2010).

 

Khalid Younis – an update

1 Comment

You’ll recall that we’ve been working with Khalid Younis, the father-of-four who lives in England and has received the devastating news that he does not qualify for Ponatinib, a treatment freely available in Scotland and Wales. The new ‘wonder’ drug is the only treatment left for the 43-year-old who is battling Chronic Myleoid Leukaemia (CML), of which there are 700 new cases a year in the UK. His body has become resistant to all other medicines and he is not eligible for a stem cell transplant. Mr Younis, a former carpet fitter, is being treated at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital and this drug is his last chance; he’s been told that his case is “not exceptional.” You can find my original posts HERE and HERE.

Whilst the story received exceptional media coverage, things may have appeared to have quietened down over the last two weeks. They haven’t.

Firstly, the petition set up by Debbie Williams has attracted 7,507 supports, the target is 10,000. If you haven’t signed the petition, please sign it now: www.change.org/p/nhs-nice-cancer-dad-denied-tratment

Kate from The Pamela Northcott Fund is putting together an appeal against the decision. Kate is an incredible person who has an amazing track record of supporting cancer patients who have been denied access to new drug therapies that have yet to be approved by NICE or refused by NICE. Kate offers this as a completely free service to patients, her reward is seeing a cancer patient on the right treatment. You can find more out about the Fund by visiting the website www.pamelanorthcottfund.org.uk.

IMG_7949

Roger Godsiff MP, Khalid Younis, Kris Griffin

Khalid and I have been in touch with Khalid’s MP, Roger Godsiff – www.rogergodsiffmp.co.uk – who has written to NHS England, NICE and the Secretary of State for Health about the case. Roger has been incredibly supportive. We met up with him last week at his home and he listened with interest to Khalid’s story and offered advice on next steps.

If you are a patient, based in England and wish to take action on this matter, please get in touch with me through my contact form. I’ll ask you to write to your MP as a CML patient and request they too write to the Secretary of State to Health to highlight Khalid’s case. I’ll help you out with the wording of the letter.

Finally, if all else fails we are considering a fund-raising campaign to pay for Khalid’s drugs. We hope that it doesn’t come to that.

All things considered, Khalid is in incredibly good spirits. He very much appreciates the efforts that everyone is making and wishes to send thanks out to you all.

We’ll keep fighting. Thanks, Kris

Khalid Younis and Kris Griffin

Khalid Younis and Kris Griffin

Experts call for equal access to CML therapies in the UK

Leave a comment

A quick update, excellent article from the Pharma Times. Kris

Medical experts are slamming a decision by NHS cost regulators that restricts use of Ariad’s Iclusig in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia in England while patients in Scotland and Wales get full access to the novel drug.

Iclusig (ponatinib) was cleared in Europe in 2013 as an orphan drug considered to offer a significant benefit to patients. However, it was not appraised by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence because of its small target population, leaving the decision on access with the Cancer Drugs Fund, which says it can only be given to patients with the rare T315I mutation, representing about 2%-20% of CML patients.

Results of a poll by the National Cancer Research Institute CML Working Group revealed that 83% of respondents support a change in CDF policy so that Iclusig is available to all appropriate patients in England in line with its approved indication, as the current disparity in access and use of treatments is failing patients.

“The CDF uses a different methodology to score therapies; by assessing the Median Total Drug Cost per Patient this effectively penalises therapies that help patients live longer,” said Mark Tanner, General Manager of ARIAD Pharma UK. “Given recent news about the restructuring of the CDF & NICE, we hope that NHS England will address this anomaly and quickly find a mechanism to allow patients in urgent need the same level of access as their neighbours in Scotland and Wales,” he added.

“Treatments should be available on an equal basis to all people with chronic phase CML across the UK; the decision should be medical, not geographical,” added Prof Mhairi Copland, Chair of NCRI CML Working Group and Professor of Translational Haematology, University of Glasgow, while Dragana Milojkovic, Department of Haematology, Imperial College School of Medicine Hammersmith Hospital, London, noted that “restricted use of therapies imposed by the CDF have seriously limited our ability to treat patients effectively, which is a barrier especially when treatments are used according to their full license elsewhere”.

by SELINA MCKEE

Read the original article here: www.pharmatimes.com/Article/15-08-25/Experts_call_for_equal_access_to_CML_therapies_in_the_UK.aspx#ixzz3jqZxTTre

Ponatinib: Scotland 1, Wales 1, England 0

Leave a comment

In recent news I reported that Iclusig® (ponatinib) had been granted access to patients in Wales by NHS Wales. You can read the whole story here. I’m pleased to be able to write today to say that patients in Scotland have been given access to ponatinib too! Both countries are providing access for ALL phases of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).

In England ponatinib is only available on the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) IF the patient has the T315i mutation. We recently reported the majority of patients were being turned down in England after making individual funding requests; full story here.

Whilst you can read the full details of the appraisal by NHS Scotland I’ll draw your attention to this:

A non-comparative phase II study of ponatinib was conducted with primary outcomes of major cytogenetic response in patients with baseline chronic phase CML and major haematologic response in patients with baseline accelerated or blast phase CML or Ph+ALL. Ponatinib demonstrated efficacy in heavily pre-treated CML and Ph+ALL patients who had received dasatinib/nilotinib as second line or further line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or who had the T315I mutation.

The studies of ponatinib show it to be very effective and NHS Scotland have recognised this, but NHS England remain steadfast and refuse to appraise ponatinib because the patient numbers are too low. We find ourselves in a situation where patients aren’t able to access a drug that could save their lives. How can the system be fair when, depending on which NHS authority you come under, will depend on the availability of a drug to you?

There is little that can be done at the moment but once Parliament reconvenes we’ll start to apply pressure and ask direct questions of the organisations that are allowing us to fall behind our counterparts in the United Kingdom.

Thanks, Kris

Advice: following a full submission considered under the orphan and end of life process:

ponatinib (Iclusig®) is accepted for use within NHS Scotland.

Indication under review: Adult patients with
• Chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who are resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation.
• Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ALL) who are resistant to dasatinib; who are intolerant to dasatinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate; or who have the T315I mutation.

A non-comparative phase II study of ponatinib was conducted with primary outcomes of major cytogenetic response in patients with baseline chronic phase CML and major haematologic response in patients with baseline accelerated or blast phase CML or Ph+ALL. Ponatinib demonstrated efficacy in heavily pre-treated CML and Ph+ALL patients who had received dasatinib/nilotinib as second line or further line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or who had the T315I mutation.

This advice takes account of the views from a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting.

Taken from: www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/SMC_Advice/Advice/1032_15_ponatinib_Iclusig/ponatinib_Iclusig

Ponatinib Access: Denied

3 Comments

I recently sent in a Freedom of Information request to NHS England to find out how many patients in England had requested ponatinib for chronic myeloid leukaemia and who would not already be entitled to it on the NHS. Currently only patients with the T315l mutation are able to have the drug prescribed by their doctor, with other patients who want the drug having to get a clinician to make a special request (an Individual Funding Request, or IFR) to the Cancer Drugs Fund, which NHS England runs.

I was shocked by the response to my query, that of the 14 patients who requested ponatinib (from April 2013 to March 2015), just 2 of them were granted access to the drug and the other 12 were denied. It seems short-sighted of NHS England not to allow patients access to a drug which could benefit them when others have stopped working, and when the only other option is often a stem cell transplant.

With such small patient numbers NICE won’t even consider appraising ponatinib, the CDF is supposed to act as a support system for patients to access drugs for rarer cancers, but the system clearly currently isn’t working.

Patients in England are again missing out compared to their counterparts in Wales, where the drug is fully approved for all CML patients.

This excellent graphic clearly shows that in the ponatinib PACE trial, patients benefited from ponatinib after they had failed other TKIs at various stages of disease progression.

ponatinib pace trial

Ponatinib: Efficacy in patients failing multiple TKIs

Leave a comment

I’ve attached a pdf poster that outlines a national study on ponatinib and reports on the efficacy in patients failing multiple TKIs.

The conclusions were:

  • Ponatinib has confirmed efficacy in a group of heavily pre-treated patients with CML.
  • The probability of achieving cytogenetic response (CCyR) on ponatinib is greater in younger patients, those with prior CCyR and those without early haematological toxicity, confirmed on multivariate analyses (data not shown).
  • Event free survival is higher in patients who received fewer TKI prior to treatment with ponatinib.

It makes for interesting study. For reasons of transparency this has been shared with me by an organisation who are working with ARIAD (who manufacture ponatinib).

Thanks, Kris

Download the PDF poster here.

Front page of the Independent: Cost of CML Drugs

Leave a comment

Well, look here. Front page of The Independent yesterday with “the news” that CML drug prices are way too high. It’s something we’ve known for ages and it’s fantastic that the damaging price of these drugs is being brought to public attention.
I think it is important that we consider the other side of the argument for a moment though, and this is not an attempt to justify the prices and defend the pharmas. These drugs are saving lives and, in some cases, curing a form of cancer. What price on that? These drugs have revolutionised CML treatment and have certainly kept me alive. Do I care about the price? No. I care that they’ve saved my life and it helps that I live in the UK and don’t have to find that money. Do I care that there are people on this planet dying from CML. YES – and this is the issue.   Morally these pharmaceutical companies have an obligation to service each territory to ensure these drugs are available at an affordable price. There are plenty of opportunities to cover research costs but there is bigger picture stuff here…even bigger than the shareholders of these companies. Let’s not use these prices as a stick to beat the industry with, after-all they’ve come up with something truly amazing that is going to change the face of healthcare forever. Instead let’s appeal to their common decency, their moral compass and put the pressure on them to deliver a fair solution. This applies to you too BMS. Your failure to provide a Patient Access Scheme in the England has meant the NHS has not been able to deliver dasatinib as a standard treatment.
What a fantastic opportunity for people to do the right thing. Will it happen? Probably not but I must have faith in the human condition. We can put pressure on the pharmaceuticals,  we can write, ask the awkward questions and make sure they know every time a CML patient dies because they can’t afford the treatment they need. Let’s be brave about this, we thank the industry with all our heart, but the time has come to be bigger than the bottom line.  Kris

The wounded surgeon plies the steel
That questions the distempered part;
Beneath the bleeding hands we feel
The sharp compassion of the healer’s art
Resolving the enigma of the fever chart.
T.S. Eliot (1888-1965) – Four Quartets ‘East Coker’ (1940) pt. 4

The real cancer killer: rip-off prices for drugs set by ‘profiteering’ Big Pharma giants

An influential group of cancer experts has warned that the high prices charged by pharmaceutical companies for cancer drugs are effectively condemning patients to death.

The group of more than 100 leading cancer physicians from around the world, including nine from the UK, accuse the drug industry of “profiteering” – making a profit by unethical methods such as by raising the cost of grain after a natural disaster.

Of the 12 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the US in 2012, 11 were priced above $100,000 (£65,000) per patient per year. In addition the price of existing drugs of proven effectiveness has been increased by up to threefold.

The specialists say: “What determines a morally justifiable ‘just price’ for a cancer drug? A reasonable drug price  should maintain healthy pharmaceutical industry profits without being viewed as ‘profiteering’. This term [profiteering] may apply to the trend of high drug prices where a life threatening medical condition is the disaster.”

The high prices mean the drugs may not be approved by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the UK forcing doctors to fill in a 14 page application apply to the Cancer Drugs fund for British patients who could benefit from them.

In addition, the rising cost of existing drugs in a cash limited health service such as the NHS means treatment is denied to other patients with other conditions.

The authors of the article, published in the journal Blood, are all specialists in blood cancers such as leukaemia, where cancer drugs have proved most effective.

One of the best known – imatinib, whose brand name is Glivec – has proved so successful in chronic myeloid leukaemia that patients who a decade ago survived for a few years can now look forward to a near-normal life expectancy.

But the cost of Glivec has risen from £18,000 per patient per year to around £21,000 in the UK, and from $30,000 to $92,000 in the US. This is despite the fact that all research costs were covered by the original price, and the number of patients treated and the length of time they are on the drug have both vastly increased because of the drug’s success.

Daniel Vasella, former chairman and chief executive of Novartis, the manufacturer, said the original price charged for Glivec in 2001 was considered “high but worthwhile” and was estimated to yield annual revenues of $900 million, enough to cover its development cost in two years. A decade later Its annual revenues in 2012 were $4.7 billion (£3 billion).

The cancer specialists say the revenue earned by Glivec over the last ten years “represent generous profits to the company”. But this has put heavy pressure on those who have to foot the bill. “Grateful patients may have become the financial victims of the treatment success, having to pay the high price annually to stay alive”.

In the US even those with health insurance may pay an average of 20 per cent of drug prices out of pocket. Drug prices are the single most frequent cause of personal bankruptcies in the US.

Three new drugs have been approved for chronic myeloid leukaemia in the last year by the FDA but the prices are “astronomical” the authors say at up to $138,000 a year per patient.

Worldwide only about a quarter of the patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who could benefit have access to drugs because of the cost. “A small fraction are rich enough to pay individually, and most are treated intermittently or not at all. The effects of these financial pressures on long term survival… are yet unknown.”

In the UK, patients are shielded from the “direct economic anxieties of illness”, the article says.  But Professor Jane Apperley, chair of the Department of Haematology at Imperial College, London, and one of the authors, said high drug prices were still a cause of harm in Britain .

“The price of a drug heavily influences the decision of NICE whether we can prescribe it on the NHS. I am chief of service at Imperial College and we are constantly being asked to reduce our spending. We have to look very carefully at the cost of the drugs we use.”

“Of course we need the pharmaceutical industry to go on developing new drugs. It is very exciting that a number of cancers are now becoming susceptible to these new drugs. But the rising cost is unsustainable. “

“The drugs are very effective at keeping people alive. But if they are priced out of what you can afford you know that you can keep people alive but you can’t afford to do so. It is completely unsustainable for the NHS because the costs are going up every year. We need a serious dialogue about whether we can sustain these costs.”

The authors of the article in Blood conclude: “We believe the unsustainable drug prices may be causing harm to patients. Advocating for lower drug prices is a necessity to save the lives of patients who cannot afford them. We believe drug prices should reflect objective measures of benefit, but should not exceed values that harm our patients and societies.”

The group say they intend to organise regular meetings and campaign for lower cancer drug prices.

A spokesperson for the UK charity Beating Blood Cancers said: “As a charity we want to see an ethical approach to drug pricing . There is no point in us investing in research if the pricing policy means drugs won’t be available to patients.”

In a statement to The Independent, Novartis said: “We recognize that sustainability of health care systems is a complex topic and we welcome the opportunity to be part of the dialogue.  Our critical role, as one of many parties working towards improving cancer care, is to discover and develop innovative treatments.”

“ Novartis innovation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed the course of the disease. Before Glivec(imatinib)* and Tasigna (nilotinib), the five-year survival in CML was only 30 percent. Today, nine out of ten patients with CML have a normal lifespan and are leading productive lives.”

“Over the years, our programs have evolved to improve patient access to our medicines. We work together with government health care systems, charities and other payers to build successful cost-sharing models.”

Expert view: ‘Price of drugs is harming patients’

The following is an extract from an article, contributed to by more than 100 leading cancer physicians from around the world, including nine from the UK, published in the journal, Blood.

This perspective reflects the views of a large group of CML experts, who believe the current [high] prices of drugs may compromise access of needy patients to highly effective therapy, and are harmful to the sustainability of our national healthcare systems…

If drug price reflects value, then it should be proportional to the benefit to patients in objective measures, such as survival prolongation, degree of tumour shrinkage, or improved quality of life. For many tumours, drug prices do not reflect these endpoints, since most anti-cancer drugs provide minor survival benefits, if at all.

As physicians, we… believe the unsustainable drug prices in CML and cancer may be causing harm to patients. Advocating for lower drug prices is a necessity to save the lives of patients who cannot afford them … For CML, and for other cancers, we believe drug prices should reflect objective measures of benefit, but should also not exceed values that harm our patients and societies.”

An ethical price tag? Cancer drugs

Brands used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia

Imatinib (Glivec) £21,000 per patient per year – Novartis
Designed from first principles, it proved hugely effective and unexpectedly turned into a blockbuster, earning billions of pounds for its makers.

Nilotinib (Tasigna) £21,000 – Novartis
Designed for patients who fail to respond to Glivec, Novartis reduced the cost to get it past Nice, whilst increasing the cost of Glivec.

Dasatinib (Sprycel) £31,000 – Bristol Myers Squibb
Also designed for patients who cannot take Glivec. But it has not been approved by Nice for use on the NHS because of its high cost.

Bosutinib (Bosulif) £76,000 – Pfizer
For patients who suffer side-effects from the other drugs. It won approval in the US in 2012 but is awaiting a licence in the UK.

Omacetaxine (Synribo) £100,000 – Teva
For patients who cannot tolerate other drugs. Approved in US in 2012 but awaiting licence in the UK.

Ponatinib (Iclusig) £90,000 – Ariad
A third-generation drug which works in a different way. Approved in the US in 2012 but awaiting a licence in the UK.

JEREMY LAURANCE    MONDAY 29 APRIL 2013

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-real-cancer-killer-ripoff-prices-for-drugs-set-by-profiteering-big-pharma-giants-8591825.html